November 3rd, 2009

Mid-Purdue-Week Rant

It’s been somewhat of an intriguing week of news and notes after Michigan hits it’s presumed 2009 season bottom. This weekend’s game has the potential to be very impactful to the program’s development, which will benefit from about 15 extra practices for a bowl game should Michigan snag that sixth win. Unless Michigan can manage a road upset against Wisconsin, and as you may have witnessed last week Michigan isn’t a top performing road squad – or upset what should be a heavily favored Ohio State team – this season will turn out to be a grand disappointment. A nice 4-0 start with what used to be considered a signature Notre Dame win – will be essentially meaningless and forgotten.

Many people coming out of the wood work this week to either tear down what Rich Rodriguez is doing as head coach and many have came out in support of RR.

Mary Sue Coleman says to the Wall Street Journal

“I don’t think it’s fair to coaches to bring them in and say, ‘We’re going to give you three years.’” she said in an interview on Friday, citing a recent example. “When Tommy Amaker came in, we stuck with him for six years. It just wasn’t going to work; it wasn’t the right fit. But it wasn’t a rushed decision.”

Charles Woodson

“I’m not excited about losing,” Woodson said Tuesday, while visiting Ann Arbor. “They started out on fire and looked good for a short period, but it’s hard to watch the place you love and played … to see the team struggling like that is hard. It’s hard.” “I’m getting flack from a guy who went to Cincinnati,” Woodson said of his Green Bay understudy, rookie Brandon Underwood. “I never thought there’d be a day in my life I was taking flack from a guy from Cincinnati.”

Here’s the deal people. This is year two for RR, but look at what he’s working with. Two true freshman quarterbacks, a new defensive coordinator, starting a true freshman walk-on in the defensive backfield, etc. The odds are stacked against this team. Now I am not completely backing Rich Rodriguez, because I also question his philosophies and playcalling at times. However, the guy deserves more time to prove his worth to this Michigan program and fan base.

Like I said a few weeks ago after the Iowa loss – if Michigan is ranked in the top 5 in two or three years and in the hunt for a national championship, nobody is going to remember this loss to Illinios last week, or the loss to Iowa a few weeks ago. The “hard work” and growing pains that any good program goes through are not easy, but in the end worth it. A couple years ago we, Michigan fans, we’re begging and craving something less conservative and simply better than what Lloyd Carr was bringing to the table year in and year out.

So at this point, you’re either in this thing or out, and the upside to sticking with RR is much better than any alternative in the near future. GO BLUE. BEAT PURDUE!

Related Posts:

4 comments to Mid-Purdue-Week Rant

  • give rich 5 years to bring the team back to the top 5. fatty from ND is getting 5-6 years. i think thats fair to give him 5 years of his players – don’t forget many fresh. redshirt – so its really a 5 year process.

  • Bradnm

    Weis is such a turd. RR will be wildly more successful at Michigan if he is given the amount of time that fatty over at ND has gotten

  • I think RR is going to get the time he is due. Even if he has a subpar, 8 win season next year – all he has to do is improve each year. I’m amazed Weis hasn’t done more with his time there at Notre Dame. He continues to get great recruiting classes, but the product on the field doesn’t seem to get any better. Things with RR and Michigan should be different, we’ve got some blinders on based on the past few weeks, but there have been bigtime improvements in just year 2 of this thing. I predict good things for this program in the next 2-3 years.

    Thanks for commenting!

  • i do love charles woodsoon..i just wanted to throw it out there….

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree